An Independent Queensland Regional & Rural
(Cairns... Far North Queensland)
The Real Story of Fluoridation
The original, and still current, Australian
fluoridation decision, backed by Acts of Parliaments, was claimed scientifically
doubtless, a promise by politicians, advised by "dental experts" and
universities plus the Australian Dental Association (ADA), the Australian
Medical Association (AMA) and the National Health and Medical Research Council
(NH and MRC).
They promoted (compelled) fluoridation as
scientifically conquering dental decay, and perfectly safe for people of all
ages and differing states of health.
There were no scientific variables,
fluoridation with its daily medical prescription dose, controlled only by each
individual's thirst, was scientific and pharmacology perfection in medical
history (Centre for Disease Control) and taught in all universities as such.
Fluoridation from every scientific and
medical perception was infallible, illustrated by data presented by Parliaments
and their Members, Health Departments, dental and medical hierarchy,
universities, the ADA, the AMA, and of course from its source, the 'Fluoride
Lobby', where the fluoride chemical abounds in endless bulk, permitted only to
dump into drinking water supplies. No other dumping permitted… too toxic.
So, the picture is exposed or overexposed
accordingly. The fluoride chemical you are forced to daily drug yourself with,
24 hours a day, in your own home, is so toxic it is not permitted, by LAW, to
dump into the ocean, seas, rivers, lakes or normal land fills.
By kind attention and honest representation
of its people, your local politician decides to dump it into your drinking
water, delivered into every home, without political or legal recourse… or
The people of Australia have NEVER had the
constitutional provision of a vote on this matter… 'the right of the people'.
Why are politicians so afraid?
The population was told how fortunate they
were to have mountains of waste toxic fluoride chemicals in sufficient
quantities to indefinitely 'serve' the world's drinking water supplies.
All that was necessary was for an
international 'Think Tank' to continually develop masterful fluoride propaganda,
for world distribution, propaganda that would destroy any written word, all
opposition, person or group.
We do not claim in any way there is no
benefit from fluoridation… BUT, there is no benefit to the public's health.
Glen S. R. Walker, F.I.M.F., E.M.E.C.S.,
Judge John Flaherty
"In my view, the evidence is quite
convincing that the addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at
one part per million is extremely deleterious to the human body, and, a review
of the evidence
will disclose that there was no convincing evidence to the
Prior to hearing this case, I gave the
matter of fluoridation little, if any, thought, but I received quite an
education, and noted that the proponents of fluoridation do nothing more than
try to impune (sic) the objectivity of those who oppose fluoridation."
Judge John Flaherty, later Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was quoted in November 1978, after 2800 pages of testimony and documentation was recorded and studied.
* Contact * INDEX *
Current Issues * Priority Issues *
Reference Index * Selwyn's
Profile * Your
Written and Authorised by Selwyn Johnston,
Cairns FNQ 4870